Cooperation, Secret Handshakes, and Imitation in the Prisoners' Dilemma
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the prisoners’ dilemma game, the only evolutionarily stable strategy is defection, even though mutual cooperation yields a higher payoff. Building on a paper by Robson (1990), we introduce mutants who have the ability to send a (costly) signal, i.e., the “secret handshake,” before each round of the game and to condition their actions on whether or not they observe the same signal from their opponent. A population playing the strategy “always defect” is vulnerable to secret handshake mutants who cooperate when they meet other secret handshakers and defect against other opponents. However, these secret handshakers are in turn vulnerable to a second round of mutants who imitate the secret handshake and then defect against all opponents. But now a new group of secret handshakers with a different secret handshake can arise. Thus, play can cycle between cooperation and defection. We study the dynamics of that cycling. We show that in the limit, as the probability of mutation goes to zero, cooperation occurs on average half the time. Using simulations to study the implications of our model when the mutation probability is larger than zero, we find that it is possible for cooperation to be sustained for long periods. In general, cooperation is favored when mutual cooperation has a large payoff advantage over mutual defection, and when the payoff advantage of unilateral defection is small. Surprisingly, however, there are cases where an increased payoff to unilateral defection actually raises the level of cooperation. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C70, C72, D60. ∗ We thank Eddie Dekel for suggesting this line of research and for helpful conversations. We also thank Jeff Ely, Juuso Valimaki, Asher Wolinsky, and John Woodruff for their suggestions and comments. For computer assistance, we thank Mehmet Sayal and especially Cem Evrendilek. All remaining errors and imperfections are ours. ** Department of Economics, Northwestern University, 2003 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208; [email protected], [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Imitation Dynamics in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma: An Exploratory Example*
This paper investigates a deterministic evolutionary process governing the adoption of strategies for playing the repeated Prisoners' Dilemma. Agents playing unsuccessful strategies attempt to imitate the strategies of successful agents. Because agents' strategies are unobservable, they must be inferred from a memory of pairwise play and a knowledge of the strategy space. As a result, winning s...
متن کاملCooperation, imitation and partial rematching
We study a setting where imitative players are matched into pairs to play a Prisoners’ Dilemma game. A well known result in such setting is that under random matching cooperation vanishes for any interior initial condition. The novelty of this paper is that we consider partial rematching: players that belong to a pair where both parties cooperate repeat partner next period whilst all other play...
متن کاملImitation, Group Selection and Cooperation
A prior signalling stage is added to the prisoner’s dilemma and the overall population involved is divided into a number of subpopulations. Evolution involves both local and global imitation—so that the process is formally one of “group selection.” A subpopulation that is not signalling and defecting against one and all can be invaded by two “secret handshake” mutants. A subpopulation that is c...
متن کاملRational Cooperation in a Finitely Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma
The Emergence and Evolution of Social Norms: Rational Cooperation in a Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma
متن کاملVoluntary Cooperation Based on Equilibrium Retribution – An Experiment Testing Finite-Horizon Folk Theorems
Unlike previous attempts to implement cooperation in a prisoners’ dilemma game with an infinite horizon in the laboratory, we focus on extended prisoners’ dilemma games in which a second (pure strategy) equilibrium allows for voluntary cooperation in all but the last round. Our four main experimental treatments distinguish long versus short horizon and strict versus non-strict additional equili...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 37 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001